Pemateri : Eri
Kurniawan
SBL (Sanggar
Budidaya Linguistik) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Goals:
·
To
prove a complete and coherent description of clausal complementation in
Sundanese.
·
To
examine the extent to which existing lingustic generalization can explan the
observed fact in the language.
Sundanese
·
No
overt case and tense marking
a.
Amung
meuli sapatu anyar.
A
AV buy shoes new.
Amung
bought a new pair shoes.
b.
Ujang
nitah Amung pikeun meuli sapatu anyar.
U AV order A
to AV buy shoes new.
Ujang
ordered Amung to buy a new pair shoes.
·
Though
Sundanese locks overt case and tense marking, it in cludes some(optinal)
agreement between the actor DP and the predicate.
Mahmud
and his future
wife want a car
Plural
A cars
wanted by ......
·
In
addition to number agreement, Sundanese also instantiates limited person
agreement.
Orang
ketiga dalam bahasa Sunda ...+eun
·
The
agreement feature set Sundanese a part from neighboring languages.
Two
generalization.
·
Complementation
is a universal feature of human languages( Noonan)
·
There
is finiteness in Indonesia
Kana(1986) and Arka(200,2011) take the position that
Indonesian, a languages typologically close to Sundanese, exhibits finiteness
manifested by temporal or aspectual auxiliaries such as akan “will”
One peculiar property of temporal or aspectual
auxiliaries in Sundanese the possibility for two auxiliaries to co-existin one
clause.
·
Agreement
= finiteness?
·
Modals=
finiteness?
Modals also occurs in a wide range of syntactic
contents
Komentar
Posting Komentar